People

Samir Bhavsar
Samir A. Bhavsar
Partner | Practice Group Co-Chair - Patent Prosecution (Firmwide)
Samir Bhavsar
Samir A. Bhavsar
Partner

Overview

AI Governance, Data Privacy and Regulatory Compliance

Samir Bhavsar is one of a small number of lawyers in the United States who holds all three of the International Association of Privacy Professionals' most rigorous practitioner credentials: the Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP), the Certified Information Privacy Professional for the United States (CIPP/US), and the Certified Information Privacy Professional for Europe (CIPP/E). That combination of AI governance framework expertise, US domestic regulatory knowledge, and European data protection depth positions him to advise companies navigating the converging demands of AI regulation across jurisdictions.

As a member of Baker Botts' Privacy, Cybersecurity & AI Governance practice, Samir counsels clients on the full spectrum of AI governance and regulatory compliance: assessing AI system risk under emerging legal frameworks, designing and implementing AI governance programs, advising on high-risk AI system obligations under the EU AI Act, and managing AI-related regulatory exposure in operationally complex environments. He is knowledgeable about both the compliance architecture question — how does an organization build a governance program that satisfies its regulatory obligations — and the harder operational question — what happens when an AI system that was supposed to help manage risk instead generates liability.

Samir is a frequent speaker on AI governance at legal and industry conferences, with recent presentations including "Proactive AI Risk Management: Empowering Legal Teams to Navigate and Mitigate Emerging Compliance Challenges" delivered at multiple national forums in 2025 and 2026. Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America for Technology Law (2023, 2024, 2025), he brings a technical foundation in electrical engineering and computer science to both the AI regulatory analysis and the client advisory work.

Intellectual Property — Full-Service Counsel

Samir is also a nationally recognized intellectual property lawyer and Co-Chair of Baker Botts' Patent Prosecution practice firmwide. His IP practice is deliberately full-service — spanning prosecution, litigation, and licensing — because he believes that portfolio strategy, litigation risk, and transactional exposure are inseparable questions that clients are better served addressing with a single integrated perspective rather than across separate engagements. Clients describe him as a "tech-savvy strategic mastermind" who "leverages his background as chief IP counsel to craft invaluable patent portfolios" (IAM Patent 1000, 2024), and as a partner who "understands the client mentality better than most and applies his considerable faculties in driving quality prosecution, litigation, and licensing outcomes" (IAM Patent 1000, 2021).

His prosecution practice spans semiconductor devices and manufacturing processes, artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles, augmented and virtual reality, cybersecurity, IoT, FinTech, and medical devices. On the litigation side, Samir has handled patent disputes in district courts across the country — with a concentration in the Northern and Eastern Districts of Texas and California — as well as Inter Partes and Ex Parte Review proceedings before the USPTO. He also advises clients on patent, software, and technology licensing agreements across inbound and outbound transactions. Samir is recommended in IAM Patent 1000 for Patent Prosecution (2021, 2022, 2024) and recognized as a Leading Lawyer by The Legal 500 U.S. for Patent Prosecution (2010, 2013).

Background

Samir received his J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School and his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan. He is admitted to practice in Texas, before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the Federal Circuit, and multiple federal district courts. He has been active in bar leadership and diversity initiatives throughout his career, including serving as President of the Dallas-Fort Worth Intellectual Property Law Association and on committees and steering bodies for the Texas Minority Counsel Program, the Dallas Bar Association, and NAPABA.

Admissions & Affiliations

  • State Bar of Texas
  • United States Patent and Trademark Office
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • United States District Courts for the Northern and Eastern Districts of Texas; Northern, Central and Southern Districts of California; the Western District of Wisconsin
  • Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP); International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP)
    Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional
  • Certified Information Privacy Professional, CIPP/US; International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP)
  • CIPP US Badge
  • Certified Information Privacy Professional, CIPP/E; International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP)
  • CIPP
  • Graduate of Dallas Regional Chamber Leadership Class of 2019
  • State Bar of Texas, Texas Minority Counsel Program Steering Committee (past member)
  • Dallas Bar Association, Minority Participation Committee (past chair)
  • North Dallas Chamber of Commerce, Past Member of Board of Directors
  • Dallas-Fort Worth Intellectual Property Law Association, President, 2008; Vice President, 2007; Treasurer, 2006

Education

  • J.D., University of Michigan Law School 1996
    cum laude
  • B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Michigan 1994
    magna cum laude
    Regents Scholar
    Eta Kappa Nu

Experience

AI Governance & Data Privacy

  • International technology company – AI governance advice and counsel regarding deployment of AI-based facial recognition technology in the U.S.
  • Real estate data and analytics company – Data privacy advice and counsel regarding data subject access requests; defending class action lawsuit involving rights of publicity
  • International technology company – Data privacy advice and counsel involving claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act
  • Global provider of industrial solutions – AI governance advice and counsel regarding the deployment of AI chatbots

Patent Prosecution & Transactional

  • International semiconductor company – patent procurement and licensing in the areas of electronic and semiconductor products
  • Start-up semiconductor company – patent procurement in the areas of semiconductor products and manufacturing
  • Biotechnology company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio
  • Autonomous vehicle company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio
  • Medical device company – IP risk assessment in support of corporate mergers & acquisition; development and management of worldwide patent portfolio
  • National banking institution – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio
  • Information standards organization – advice and counsel on licensing, patent litigation, and intellectual property risks associated with business transactions
  • International provider of climate control products for the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration markets – development and management of worldwide patent portfolio; advice and counsel regarding freedom-to-operate studies
  • International convenience store chain – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio; advice and counsel on licensing, freedom-to-operate studies, and intellectual property risks associated with business transactions
  • International provider of milking systems and dairy farm equipment – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio; advice and counsel regarding EU oppositions
  • Start-up network security company – development and management of patent portfolio regarding cyber-security technologies
  • International software company – advice on licensing, patent procurement, patent portfolio categorization, and IP support for corporate transactions
  • International online retail company – patent procurement in the areas of cloud computing, electronic commerce, and robotic technologies
  • International financial services company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio directed to financial services and electronic gaming applications; advice on licensing and litigation
  • International networking company – advice on licensing, patent procurement, and patent portfolio categorization
  • Start-up wireless supply chain provider – development and management of a patent portfolio directed to wireless mobility and tracking using RFID technology; advice on licensing
  • Optical networking company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio directed to all-optical processors and subsystems for high-capacity networks

Patent Litigation

  • National Nail Corp. v. PrimeSource Building Products Inc. (Northern District of Texas) – Defended PrimeSource against allegations of patent infringement involving hidden deck fastener technology in which case settled
  • Rosen Technologies LLC v. Lennox Industries Inc. (Northern District of Texas) – Defended Lennox against allegations of patent infringement involving smart thermostat technology in which case was settled in conjunction with institution of IPR petitions for five patents-in-suit
  • VOIP-PAL.com v. AT&T Corp., et al. (District of Nevada) – Defended AT&T against allegations of patent infringement involving Voice-over-IP technology in which case was dismissed following resolution of early motion practice and sustained on appeal to the Federal Circuit
  • Intellectual Ventures II, LLC. v. AT&T Corp., et al. (Western District of Texas) – Defended AT&T against allegations of patent infringement involving DSL technologies in which case was dismissed based on pre-trial resolution
  • Beco Dairy Automation, Inc. v. Global Tech. Systems, Inc. (Eastern District of California) – Represented GTS to assert patent and copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation claims related to dairy equipment in which case settled
  • Orlando Communications, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. (Middle District of Florida) – Handled patent litigation defense of AT&T regarding cellular technologies in which case was dismissed following resolution of early motion practice and filing of IPR petitions
  • Digital CBT LLC v. AT&T, Inc. (Central District of California) – Handled patent litigation defense of AT&T regarding video processing technology in which client was awarded summary judgment of non-infringement
  • SpeedGauge, Inc. v. Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. (Southern District of California) – Handled patent litigation defense and assertion regarding vehicle tracking technology in which client settled on favorable terms following claim construction order
  • Agricultural Instruments Corp. v. BouMatic LLC (Western District of Wisconsin) – Handled patent litigation defense of BouMatic regarding dairy equipment technology in which client settled on favorable terms after initial discovery exchange
  • Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of HTC America, Inc. regarding antenna technology used in mobile devices in which client settled on favorable terms
  • TQP Development, LLC v. Merrill Lynch & Co., et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America regarding data encryption technology in which client settled on favorable terms
  • Restricted Spending Solutions, LLC v. Bank of America, et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Bank of America regarding e-commerce technologies in which client settled on favorable terms
  • Actus LLC v. Bank of America, et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Bank of America regarding e-commerce technology in which client settled on favorable terms
  • Network Signatures, Inc. v. Wal-Mart, Inc. (Central District of California) – Handled patent litigation defense of Wal-Mart regarding data encryption technologies in which client settled on favorable terms
  • Arrival Star, S.A. and Melvino Technologies Ltd. v. Macy's, Inc. et al. (Southern District of Florida) – Handled patent litigation defense of Wal-Mart regarding supply chain technologies in which client settled on favorable terms
  • RFID Tracker, Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores, et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Wal-Mart regarding RFID technology in which plaintiff stipulated to non-infringement following favorable claim construction order, which was sustained on appeal to the Federal Circuit
  • Prism Technologies LLC v. Computer Associates International, Inc. (District of Delaware) – Handled patent litigation defense of Computer Associates regarding identity and access management technology in which plaintiff stipulated to non-infringement following favorable claim construction order, which was sustained on appeal to the Federal Circuit


Awards and Community

Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America for Technology Law, 2023, 2024, & 2025

Recommended in IAM Patent 1000 for Patent Prosecution, 2021, 2022, & 2024

Recommended in The Legal 500 U.S. as a "Leading Lawyer" for Patent Prosecution, 2010, & 2013

Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (Thomson Reuters), 2015, & 2018

Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer-Rising Star (Thomson Reuters), 2006, 2010, & 2012