People

Bethany Salpietra Baker Botts Dallas
Bethany R. Salpietra
Partner

Overview

Technology companies turn to Bethany Salpietra for strategic intellectual property counsel and advocacy in high-stakes patent disputes, particularly where litigation risk, business objectives, and innovation strategy intersect. She represents clients in federal district courts across the country, with a focus on the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas.

Bethany is known for shaping disputes at the outset. She helps clients navigate complex patent litigation with strategies that integrate legal precision, procedural leverage, and business judgment, enabling companies to assess risk early and seize strategic advantage. She is particularly effective in leveraging venue, personal jurisdiction, and other procedural tools to influence where and how cases are litigated, often altering the trajectory of a dispute before it reaches the merits. This approach is especially valuable for companies facing suit in unfamiliar or strategically disadvantageous forums, including foreign companies navigating U.S. patent litigation exposure. Clients value her ability to cut through complexity, anticipate challenges, and execute strategies aligned with broader commercial and operational objectives.

On the merits, Bethany handles complex patent disputes involving claim construction, discovery strategy, and expert challenges across a broad range of technologies, including networking and cloud infrastructure, telecommunications systems, software platforms, and medical and consumer devices. Her experience extends across the full range of patent dispute forums, including appellate proceedings before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Section 337 investigations before the International Trade Commission, and inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

Bethany's approach is informed by her in-house experience during a 2024 secondment with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, where she managed global patent disputes and intellectual property strategy. This perspective enables her to deliver advice that is not only legally sound, but practical, business-focused, and calibrated to the operational realities her clients face. She regularly advises clients on issues that sit at the intersection of intellectual property, product development, commercialization, and enterprise risk, and is particularly effective at helping companies proactively assess litigation exposure and align IP strategy with broader business objectives.

In addition to her litigation practice, Bethany advises clients on strategic intellectual property and technology matters across the innovation lifecycle. She has experience counseling clients on patent portfolio development and monetization, technology licensing and commercialization, invention development, dispute readiness, and innovation-focused IP strategy. Clients value her ability to translate technical and legal complexity into practical guidance that supports business growth, strategic decision-making, and the development and protection of intellectual property as a core business function.

Bethany is active in the Dallas legal and technology communities, including the Dallas Bar Association's Intellectual Property Section and STEM-focused initiatives in partnership with Tech Titans. Outside of her practice, she enjoys puzzles, mahjong, learning Japanese, and building Lego creations with her children.

Admissions & Affiliations

  • State Bar of Texas
  • United States Patent and Trademark Office
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • United States District Courts for the Northern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas

Education

  • J.D., John Marshall Law School 2015
    cum laude
    Certificate in Intellectual Property Law (Patent Law Concentration)
    Dean's List
    CALI Award (Patent and Trade Secrets)
    Asian Pacific American Law Student Association
    Phi Alpha Delta
  • B.S., Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Dallas 2011
  • Comparative Intellectual Property Summer Abroad Program, Peking University 2013

Experience

  • AGIS Software Development LLC v. Lyft, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas) / Lyft, Inc. v. AGIS Software Development LLC (Northern District of California) — In parallel patent litigation involving location-based mobile application technology, secured rare venue dismissal of infringement action in the Eastern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) — upheld by the district court following plaintiff's objections and de novo review — while simultaneously defeating plaintiff's motion to transfer the parallel declaratory judgment action from the Northern District of California to the Eastern District of Texas, preserving client's chosen forum across both proceedings.
  • Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft, Inc. (Western District of Texas) — Secured dismissal of patent infringement action against Lyft for improper venue, with ruling upheld by the district court following plaintiff's objections and de novo review.
  • MG Freesites Ltd. v. DISH Technologies L.L.C. (Northern District of California) / Aylo Freesites Ltd. v. DISH Technologies L.L.C. (District of Delaware) / DISH Technologies L.L.C. v. MG Premium Ltd. (District of Utah) — In parallel multi-forum patent litigation involving adaptive bitrate streaming technology, defeated declaratory judgment action in the Northern District of California on personal jurisdiction grounds; successfully opposed motion to dismiss DISH's infringement action in the District of Utah; and secured transfer of a subsequently filed declaratory judgment action from the District of Delaware to the District of Utah — preserving DISH's chosen forum across all three proceedings.
  • DISH Technologies L.L.C. v. WebGroup Czech Republic (District of Utah) — Defeated motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in patent infringement action involving adaptive bitrate streaming technology.

26 January 2023 Speeches & Presentations Apportionment in Patent Damage Calculations
26 January 2023 Speeches & Presentations Apportionment in Patent Damage Calculations