People

Overview

Steve Maule combines technical knowledge, insatiable curiosity, and a meticulous nature to solve a range of intellectual property problems for clients. Drawing on years of experience as a hardware and software engineer, Steve focuses on clients’ technologies as much as the legal landscape and brings a technical depth that few attorneys can match. From solo founders to Fortune 500 companies, clients turn to Steve when the technology is complex, the stakes are high, and the details matter.

Steve litigates on both sides of the “v” and advises clients across all areas of intellectual property law, including matters involving patent, trademark, trade secret, and copyright litigation; inter partes review and ex parte reexamination proceedings; patent and trademark portfolio development; and related technology agreements and transactions.

Before law school, Steve worked as a software engineer for The Boeing Company and L-3 Communications, where he developed software for aircraft simulation and aircraft communication systems, and as a hardware engineer for IBM on blade server development. This background allows him to work directly with engineers, translate technical details into terms judges and juries understand, and evaluate infringement, validity, and damages issues with an insider’s eye.

Steve also teaches the next generation of IP lawyers at his alma mater, the University of Houston Law Center. Each spring, Steve teaches Procedure of Patent Litigation, an upper-level course offered through the Institute for Intellectual Property and Information Law, in which he guides students—from pleadings to post-trial—through the litigation process with real-world anecdotes and hands-on exercises.

Steve has a strong commitment to pro bono legal services and has successfully represented pro bono clients in asylum proceedings, applications for legal guardianship, trademark applications, and expunction proceedings.

Admissions & Affiliations

  • State Bar of Texas
  • United States Patent and Trademark Office
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas
  • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Education

  • J.D., University of Houston Law Center 2016
    magna cum laude
    Articles Editor, Houston Law Review
    Order of the Coif
    Order of the Barons
    UHLC Intellectual Property Student Organization
    UHLC AIPLEF Jan Jancin Award Nominee, 2015
  • M.B.A., University of Houston 2016
    Bauer Excellence Scholar
  • M.S., Electrical & Computer Engineering, Baylor University 2007
  • B.S., Electrical & Computer Engineering, Baylor University 2005
    magna cum laude
    Eta Kappa Nu
    Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, President

Experience

  • ClearPlay, Inc. v. DISH Network, LLC (D. Utah) – represented DISH in four-patent litigation involving set top box technology at District Court, and at the USPTO in ex parte reexaminations.
  • Certain Fitness Devices, Streaming Components Thereof, and Systems Containing Same (ITC) – represented DISH in asserting four patents related to media streaming technology.
  • Pascal Technologies v. Cambridge Enterprise Limited, et al. (PTAB) – represented Pascal in inter partes review challenge involving solid-state refrigerant technologies.
  • General Video, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc., et al. (EDTX) – represented ASUSTeK in patent litigation involving DisplayPort technologies.
  • Velocity Communication Techs. v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (EDTX) – represented ASUSTeK in multi-party patent litigation involving Wi-Fi devices.
  • Redwood Technologies, LLC v. Realtek Semiconductor Corporation (WDTX) – represented Realtek in two cases involving 14 patents asserted against Wi-Fi technologies.
  • Netflix, Inc. v. Broadcom Inc. et al. (NDCA) – represented Netflix in the assertion of 10 patents across two cases involving virtual machine technologies.
  • Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. DISH Wireless L.L.C. (EDTX) – represented DISH in two cases involving eight patents asserted against DISH’s cellular technology.
  • Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices, and Hardware and Software Components Thereof (ITC) – represented TP-Link in design-around efforts and ex parte reexamination of asserted patents involving Wi-Fi technologies.
  • Berman v. AT&T (NDTX) – represented AT&T against inventor/patent owner asserting patents directed to video display technologies.
  • Additional litigation and pre-litigation matters including:
    • patent disputes involving 802.11/Wi-Fi technologies; electrical power technology; video streaming and display technologies; satellite, cellular, and radio network technologies and systems; web development and internet technologies; semiconductor manufacturing technology and semiconductor circuitry design;
    • patent, trademark, and copyright disputes involving online gaming technologies; and
    • patent inventorship disputes related to nanopore sequencing patents and online gaming technologies.
  • Advised and consulted on technology and service agreements related to entity and IP portfolio due diligence and acquisition, and development of new technologies, products, and services.
  • Prepared and prosecuted patents for clients related to wireless security systems, augmented and virtual reality headsets and systems, audio technologies, machine learning technologies, retail shopping systems and mobile applications, and other electrical, computer, and software technologies as well as oil and gas and mechanical technologies including subsurface sensing and control technologies and proppant metering systems.