Our London office opened in 1998 and has a growing team of both UK and internationally qualified lawyers. Our lawyers have an in-depth knowledge of the complex legal issues facing any enterprise looking to invest and do business in the United Kingdom.

On the transactional side, the London office has a large dedicated energy team. Recent assignments have included pipeline projects, gas projects (including LNG and gas-to-liquids), mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures, project financing, infrastructure projects, privatization, oil and gas exploration and production and carbon emissions trading. In addition to the energy sector, we are deeply entrenched in transactional work in all its forms, from M&A, to joint ventures, to advice on capital markets. Particular industry focuses include technology, media, telecoms, petrochemicals, life sciences and financial services sectors.

The London office includes a thriving dispute resolution practice with experience in complex litigation and international arbitration and mediation. The office also includes an intellectual property team with broad experience in all IP areas, including litigation. Recently, the London team added white collar defense matters and international fraud and corruption investigations to its capabilities.

The London office was recognized by researchers in the latest Chambers UK publication for its work in the Projects and Energy: Energy & Natural Resources category and in the latest The Legal 500 publication for M&A. We pride ourselves on the team approach we bring to every engagement, and we believe our collaborative approach improves the results we earn for our clients.

Next Story / Baker Botts

18 Major Trial Outcomes in 12 Weeks

HOUSTON, April 16, 2015 - Baker Botts, a leading international law firm, today announced that during the first 12 weeks of 2015, the firm won 18 significant trial and other litigation matters for clients.

"In each of these cases, all very different and all dealing with different facets of law - from energy, to financial fraud, to patent litigation to insurance defense and a pro bono appeal of a death row case - our trial lawyers and litigators prevailed in challenging and complex cases and achieved significant victories for our clients," said Andrew M. Baker, Managing Partner of Baker Botts.

"We try cases, and this is a record that is hard to beat," added David Sterling, Chair of the Litigation department at Baker Botts. "Our firm has a robust, vibrant and talented litigation department and these 9 trial wins and 9 other litigation victories, all in the first quarter of the year, highlight the momentum the firm has and the expertise of our trial lawyers," added Mr. Sterling.

A summary of the trial wins follows:

  • Baker Botts successfully defended OAO Gazprom, the largest Russian energy company, and the other defendants in a trade secrets case in state court in Fort Worth, Texas. The plaintiff in that case, Moncrief Oil, which sought over $1.25 billion in damages from Gazprom, dismissed its case with prejudice after 4 weeks of trial.
  • Baker Botts won an important jury trial in federal court in Dallas, Texas on behalf of Ralph Janvey, the receiver for Stanford International Bank, who is working to recover assets on behalf of Stanford’s defrauded investors. In the trial against former U.S. Ambassador to Ecuador Peter Romero, the jury found Romero must return hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees he received as a member of Stanford’s advisory board.
  • Baker Botts successfully defended Samsung in a jury trial in federal court in Austin, Texas in which Masakazu Ushijima, a Japanese inventor sued Samsung for patent infringement relating to Samsung’s LCD televisions and computer monitors. The jury found that none of the Samsung products infringed Ushijima’s patent.
  • In a trial before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Baker Botts obtained a ruling for its client, CaptionCall, against Ultratec, a competitor of CaptionCall, in providing communications and telephone equipment to the hearing impaired. The PTAB ruled that all eight Ultratec patents at issue were not patentable.
  • Baker Botts won a jury trial in a breach of contract case for LyondellBasell in state court in Houston, Texas against GIM Channelview. The jury awarded LyondellBasell $8.8 million – almost the full amount sought – and awarded GIM Channelview nothing on its $4.5 million counterclaim.
  • A jury in federal court in Dallas found for Baker Botts’ client, De Boulle Diamond & Jewelry, Inc., on all issues in a trademark case involving the right to use the word "Boulle" in the U.S. diamond and jewelry business.
  • Baker Botts associates won three jury trials in motor vehicle accident cases on behalf of insureds of Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Company.

In addition to those trial wins, Baker Botts has achieved the following other victories in litigation matters thus far in 2015:

  • The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted a new hearing to Linda Carty, who has been on death row for over a decade, on the basis prosecutorial misconduct at her trial. Baker Botts is representing Carty on appeal pro bono.
  • Baker Botts won a dismissal with prejudice of a securities class action lawsuit in federal court in Houston against a major engineering and construction company and its executives.
  • The Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment barring an indemnity claim brought by Baker Botts' client, a major oil and gas company, and rendered judgment that the client was owed duties to defend and indemnify.
  • The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment rendered by a district court against Stanford receiver Ralph Janvey in favor of The Golf Channel. The Court of Appeals held that The Golf Channel is liable to Janvey for nearly $6 million that The Golf Channel had been paid by Stanford.
  • Baker Botts obtained a reversal from the Dallas Court of Appeals of a $38 million judgment in a case involving aviation services. Baker Botts was brought into the case to handle the appeal following entry of judgment.
  • After issuing a Wells Notice, the SEC closed an investigation into alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in Africa by Baker Botts’ client, an exploration company.
  • The Texas Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision against Baker Botts client AT&T, and ruled that the Harris County Flood Control District must pay AT&T’s expenses to relocate its facilities from a bridge scheduled for demolition by the District’s flood control plan. Baker Botts was brought into the case at the appeals stage.
  • The Texas Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision in favor of Baker Botts client, The Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, in a suit brought against it by the City of Houston and a group of employees challenging the pension system’s determination that city convention and hotel workers who were transferred to a quasi-governmental entity controlled by the city were still covered "employees" under the city worker pension plan.
  • Baker Botts defeated a motion to certify a class of Louisiana purchasers of commercial waste hauling services in an antitrust class action suit in federal court in Louisiana against a local subsidiary of Waste Management.
Next Story / Baker Botts

Texas Powerhouse: Baker Botts

01 June 2015
Texas Powerhouse: Baker Botts
Law360, Houston
Next Story / MLP Webinar

Watch our Online Webinar: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations Regarding MLP Qualifying Income

Click here to view a recording of the MLP Webinar:  IRS Issues Proposed Regulations Regarding MLP Qualifying Income.

The IRS has released proposed regulations regarding what types of income derived from natural resources satisfy the section 7704(d)(1)(E) publicly traded partnership (PTP) qualifying income rules.

The proposed regulations provide guidance on section 7704(d)(1)(E) concerning qualifying income from the exploration, development, mining and production, processing, refining, transportation, and marketing of minerals and natural resources. The proposed regulations also address income earned from providing services to others in the oil and gas industry. They do not address other forms of qualifying income.

The proposed regulations are generally applicable to periods after they are issued in final form. The IRS has requested comments on the proposed regulations before they are finalized and become effective.

The IRS had announced a halt in March 2014 on letter ruling requests regarding whether a PTP’s income is qualifying income under section 7704. In March 2015, this pause was lifted and the IRS announced that it intended to release proposed regulations that provide guidance concerning qualifying income from the exploration, development, mining and production, processing, refining, transportation, and marketing of minerals and natural resources.

Next Story / London

Enhancing service to clients doing business in the UK, Europe and internationally