KNOWING MATTERS

BREAKING NEWS

HOUSTON, January 18, 2017 - Baker Botts, L.L.P., a leading international law firm, announced today the promotion of two new Counsel.

“David and Kathryn are outstanding lawyers who are focused on meeting the needs of our global clients on a daily basis and really represent our Firm’s dedication to providing the best in client service,” said Andrew M. Baker, Managing Partner of Baker Botts.

David Cardwell, Counsel

Mr. Cardwell is an Antitrust and Competition lawyer based in the firm’s Brussels office. His practice focuses on EU competition law, including a particular concentration on EU and international merger control laws. Mr. Cardwell has represented clients in significant mergers and acquisitions across many industry areas, including the technology, pharmaceutical, media, automotive and heavy industry sectors. He has counseled clients in merger reviews before both the European Commission and national competition authorities, including cases involving advice on media plurality, regulated water industries and defense-related mergers.

Katie Juffa, Special Counsel

Ms. Juffa is an Intellectual Property lawyer based in Dallas. Her practice focuses on a range of intellectual property matters, including patent prosecution, intellectual property counseling, technology transfers and patent litigation. Ms. Juffa prepares and prosecutes patent applications relating to telecommunications, software, financial services and other technologies. She also drafts claim charts and prepares arguments for reexamination and inter partes review before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.


Next Story / VIDEO SERIES

Litigation Partner Seth Taube Discusses Corporate Compliance and CFIUS

Baker Botts Partner Seth Taube, Securities and Shareholder Litigation chair in the New York office, discusses corporate compliance and The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) as some of the important areas pertaining to international trade. 
 
Taube discusses integral compliance issues that corporate counsel should consider, especially given the recent developments around U.S. trade sanctions. He states that international trade is one of the most “under-appreciated areas of corporate compliance” with a lot of landmines and areas to get into trouble, and that it’s not just “put it in the box and ship.” Taube identifies a potential compliance landmine where a harmless task contributes to the transfer of sensitive information to a foreign country. He also discusses the important role CFIUS has on in international trade where the government entity could stop the sale of a U.S. company to a foreign buyer, without any appeal, if the agency doesn't feel that the transaction is appropriate.    

Please click to watch the video.


Next Story / BREAKING NEWS

Resignation of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chair Creates Review Backlog and Potential Gridlock

WASHINGTON, January 27, 2017 – The resignation of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) Chairman Norman C. Bay leaves the FERC with only two Commissioners serving on the five-member commission. 

“The Commission requires a quorum of three members to issue substantive orders, regulations, and policy initiatives,” said Jay Ryan, a Partner with Baker Botts based in Washington. “Given the backlog of Trump Administration nominees currently pending before the Senate, it could take several weeks or months for a new FERC Commissioner to be nominated and confirmed,” added Mr. Ryan. 

As a result, the FERC will not be able to resolve pending proceedings, conduct other official business and could fail to meet key deadlines established in federal statutes. The lack of a quorum is also likely to impact the FERC’s oversight and enforcement activities, since the FERC will be unable to issue orders approving audit findings, settlements of investigations, and orders to show cause. 

“This creates a huge potential challenge for regulated utilities and energy companies. For example, under the Natural Gas Act and Federal Power Act, regulated companies are required to file changes to rates and tariffs 30 and 60 days, respectively, prior to the date upon which they become effective,” said Mr. Ryan. 

“However, if the FERC fails to act within the time that those rates go into effect, the changes become effective automatically and if the FERC wishes to order further changes, it would have to do so under statutory provisions that place a heavier burden on the agency. Further, any requests for rehearing of the FERC’s orders under those statutes that are not acted upon by the FERC within a prescribed period are automatically denied,” added Mr. Ryan. 

“One of the more significant effects that the lack of a quorum could have is in delaying the approval of any natural gas pipeline projects currently pending before the agency. The FERC staff can continue to prepare environmental documents and otherwise develop the record in major pipeline construction project proceedings,” said Brooksany Barrowes, a Washington based Partner. 

”Only the Commissioners, acting on the authority of the FERC, can currently approve those projects. Given the need for expanded gas infrastructure and the narrow construction window many projects face, this could be a major issue,” added Ms. Barrowes. 

Baker Botts’ Partners Jay Ryan and Brooksany Barrowes have extensive experience representing clients before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and are available for comment. 

Next Story / BREAKING NEWS

Baker Botts Announces the Promotion of New Counsel