We regularly argue patent appeals at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and other IP appeals at federal and state appeals venues. Baker Botts has top-notch IP appellate lawyers who deliver a strong record especially in handling Federal Circuit appeals. Over the past decade, we have handled over 250 appeals before the Federal Circuit buttressing our top-ranked active IP Litigation, International Trade Commission, and PTAB Trials Practices. We embed appellate professionals within our IP Teams to help them address key legal issues at trial, identify post-trial and appeal issues, and prepare post-trial motions to properly preserve issues for appeal.
Our appellate lawyers have argued before all 13 of the United States Courts of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court. Nearly all of our appellate lawyers have served as judicial clerks - for the United States Supreme Court, several United States Courts of Appeals, including the Federal Circuit—providing them insight into how appellate courts operate and various appellate judges. We have a deep bench of lawyers with experience arguing before the Federal Circuit.
We have received numerous awards and recognition for our appellate practice. We hold the recognition of "IP Practice Group of the Year" by Law360 for 2023. We are also ranked Band 2 in "Nationwide Intellectual Property Appellate" and Band 2 in "Texas Appellate" by Chambers USA 2023.
We consistently break new ground. At the Supreme Court, we assisted Qualcomm defend against Apple’s invalidity challenge based on Apple’s lack of standing (Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, 21-746, U.S. Supreme Court). For DISH Network, we helped secure its status as a “prevailing party” in a civil action when it defeated an infringement claim by invalidating the patent in IPR, anchoring DISH’s ability to obtain an exceptionality finding and to recover almost $1.5 million in attorneys’ fees in defending a decade-long dispute (Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC v. DISH Network LLC (2019-1283, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). We refuted an argument that the Federal Circuit noted was made “not infrequently” by patentees fighting invalidity challenges under Section 101: “that their claims do improve the functioning of the computer itself.” (Customedia Technologies, LLC v. DISH Network, 2018-2239, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) We helped AT&T and Ericsson expand the ability of defendants to rely on a patentee’s statements to the Patent Office as a basis to support summary judgment of noninfringement. (Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. AT& Mobility et al., 2018-1449, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).
We approach trial with an eye towards appeal. Our clients’ cases are high-stakes, and we approach every trial by focusing on preserving trial issues for appeal. Our patent litigation teams embed us as co-counsel to refine issues and set the stage for appeal, and our appellate lawyers routinely represent clients by working alongside trial teams to develop case-strategies. This means drafting critical briefs during trial, preserving objections, developing dispositive theories, and arguing mid-trial motions. Our appellate lawyers are an integral part of the team long before an appeal is filed.
IP Experience at the Supreme Court. Baker Botts’ Appellate Practice is “highly acclaimed” (Chambers USA 2020) with technical acumen and U.S. Supreme Court experience. For example, we filed briefs at the Supreme Court in Apple v. Qualcomm, Google v. Oracle, Thryv, SCA Hygiene, Cuozzo and Halo/Stryker. In the life sciences area we have filed amicus briefs on behalf of both biopharmaceutical companies as well as industry organizations in several of the recent cases relating to patent eligibility, including, in connection with the Myriad case, at the district court, the Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Quarterly Index of Federal Circuit Cases and Thought Leadership. Our understanding of Federal Circuit law is expansive. We closely monitor Federal Circuit precedential opinions and prepare a deeply outlined index by subject matter (invalidity, infringement, claim construction, etc.) of recent cases making relevant legal points - in order to assist clients seeking to identify recent law relevant to a particular problem. The links below provide the most recent documents. Baker Botts also hosts an annual webinar on Supreme Court and Federal Circuit IP decisions. We are key contributors to the Federal Circuit Bar Association, serving on various committees and regularly speaking at the annual Bench & Bar program.
Contacts
Related Experience
-
results
Page of
Baylor College of Medicine - Gensetix, Inc. et al v. Baylor College Of Medicine et al - Patent Infringement
NBA & Turner Broadcasting - Front Row Technologies v. MLB Advanced Media et al. - Patent Litigation
NBA Media Ventures LLC - Affinity Labs v. NBA Media Ventures et al. - Patent Litigation
Pharmacosmos - Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Patent Litigation - Inter Partes Review
MasterCard - Leon Stambler vs. MasterCard Inc. - Patent Litigation
DISH Network - Dragon IP v. DISH Network - Patent Litigation
MasterCard International Inc. - D'Agostino, John vs. MasterCard Inc., et al - Patent Litigation
News
Join us for IPWatchdog's Patent Litigation Masters™ 2023
Deal TownDeal Town
Fed Circuit Apple ruling has little Fintiv impact: counsel
Managing IPManaging IP
Fintiv Challenge Rolls On, But Odds Of Sinking Rule Dwindle - Law360
law360.comlaw360.com
Christa Brown-Sanford Named Co-Chair of Baker Botts’ IP Department
Pot Co. Canopy Takes CBD Patent Row To Fed. Circ.
Law360Law360
Patent Eligibility Case Is Teed Up for Next Supreme Court Term
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
Federal Circuit Confirms ANDA Notice Letters Are Not Acts of Infringement for Venue Purposes
New York Law JournalNew York Law Journal
Baker Botts Lawyers Ranked in 2021 IAM Patent 1000: The World's Leading Patent Professionals
Fed Circuit Affirms Exclusion of Source Code Containing Hearsay
New York Law JournalNew York Law Journal
Venue Ruling May Spur Patent Owners To Sue First, Talk Later
Law360Law360
Skilled in the Art: It's Google v. Oracle All Over Again at Second Circuit + Cisco Closes in on Flat Fee Award + Ericsson and Samsung Avert Injunction-Geddon
Law.comLaw.com
PacBio v. Oxford Nanopore
Global Legal ChronicleGlobal Legal Chronicle
Fed. Circ. Backs Oxford Nanopore's DNA Tech IP Trial Victory
Law360Law360
Federal Circuit Denies Retrial to Pacific Biosciences in DNA-Sequencing Patent Dispute
Law StreetLaw Street
Federal Circuit Upholds Delaware Jury's Finding in DNA Sequencing Patent Case
Delaware Business Court InsiderDelaware Business Court Insider
Fed. Circ. Affirms PacBio Loss on its DNA-Sequencing Patent Claims
ReutersReuters
Oxford Nanopore’s Trial Win Over DNA Sequencing Patents Upheld
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
Baylor, Gensetix Agree To Drop Cancer Patent Fight For Good
Law360Law360
Apple Can’t Appeal Patent Board Rulings After Qualcomm Deal
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
Fed. Circ. Says Qualcomm Deal Dooms Apple's PTAB Appeals
Law360Law360
Biden's Federal Circuit nominee brings patent expertise, diversity
Westlaw TodayWestlaw Today
Fintiv Rule Challenges Face Long Odds After Fed. Circ. Ruling
Law360Law360
Supreme Court Asked to Step in Amid Genus Claims Losing Streak
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
What Does the Future Hold for Intellectual Property in 2021?
Law.comLaw.com
Problems With USPTO Withholding Record For Some Appeals
Law360Law360
No Fed. Circ. Revival For TeleSign Patents Axed Under Alice
Law360Law360
Fed. Circ. Rejects Ex-Chief's Call To Clarify Alice In Dish Case
Law360Law360
Apple, Cisco Get $4.2 Million in Attorneys' Fees in Patent Case
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
Fed. Circ. Gives Dish, SiriusXM New Shot At Fees In IP Fight
Law360Law360
3 COVID-19 Changes IP Attys Want To Keep & 1 That Must Go
Law360Law360
Justices, Congress Might Tackle PTAB Constitutionality Next
Law360Law360
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies Inc
Global Legal ChronicleGlobal Legal Chronicle
Fed. Circ. Won't Undo Voip-Pal's Patent Losses To Tech Titans
Law360Law360
Dish Network Win on Set-Top Ad Patents Upheld by Federal Circuit
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
Fed. Circ. Hands Wins To Dish In Ad Data Storage IP Fight
Law360Law360
Federal Circuit: Here's What 'Improving the Function of a Computer' Means
Law.comLaw.com
Biggest Patent Verdicts Fall To Fed. Circ.’s Ever-Moving Target
Law360Law360
Dish Says Customedia's 2nd Arthrex Expansion Bid Fails
Law360Law360
Texas Says It Can't Be Forced to Bring a Patent Suit
Texas LawyerTexas Lawyer
Nintendo’s $10 Million Escape a Cautionary Patent Law Tale
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
Recent Takes From the Supreme Court and Federal Circuit on Attorney Fees Awards in Patent Cases
New York Law JournalNew York Law Journal
Proving Printed Publication As Prior Art In IPR Proceedings
Law360Law360
Congress in Hot Seat to Fix Patent Law After High Court Denials
Bloomberg LawBloomberg Law
Justices Slam Door On Pleas To Redo Patent Eligibility
Law360Law360
The Hottest Food And Beverage IP Topics Of 2019
Law360Law360
Thought Leadership
Third Quarter 2024 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesRedesigning Obviousness: Federal Circuit's New Test for Obviousness in Design Patents
External ArticleNew York Law Journal
Second Quarter 2024 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesUSPTO Issues Updated Guidance Highlighting the Requirement for a Flexible Approach to the Obviousness Determination
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesFirst Quarter 2024 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesPatent Office Issues New Guidance on the Law of Obviousness
External ArticleNew York Law Journal
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesLatte Prior Art: Federal Circuit Holds the Plain Meaning of Espresso Pod 'Barcode' Is Defined by Its Visual Appearance
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Fourth Quarter 2023 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesRecent Federal Circuit Guidance on Obviousness
External ArticleNew York Law Journal
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesThird Quarter 2023 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesElaborating on Arguments After IPR Institution
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Federal Circuit Scrutinizes PTAB Decision on Secondary Considerations
External ArticleNew York Law Journal
Does a License to "Make" a Patented Product Inherently Include a Right to Have a Third Party Make the Product or its Components?
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesDesign Patent Obviousness - Federal Circuit Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Bringing Home the Bacon: The Federal Circuit Clarifies Threshold for Joint Inventorship
External ArticleNew York Law Journal
Second Quarter 2023 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesU.S. Supreme Court Affirmed Patent Enablement Requirement in Amgen
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Update
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesFirst Quarter 2023 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesData: Ups and Downs of West Texas Transfer Motions
External ArticleManaging IP
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesVidal's Tenure May Make the PTAB a More Desirable Litigation Venue
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Update
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesDistrict Court Ventures Into Non-Practicing Entity's Third-Party Litigation Funding
Client UpdatesIP Update
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesFourth Quarter 2022 Federal Circuit Update
Client UpdatesThird Quarter 2022 Federal Circuit Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesSecond Quarter 2022 Federal Circuit Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesNo Bright-Line Rules for Jurisdiction: The Federal Circuit's Decision in Apple Inc. v. Zipit Wireless, Inc.
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesFirst Quarter 2022 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesFourth Quarter 2021 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesFederal Circuit Confirms ANDA Notice Letters Are Not Acts of Infringement for Venue Purposes
External ArticleNew York Law Journal, Volume 266, No. 99
Third Quarter 2021 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesAssignor Estoppel Narrowed but Largely Intact After Minerva Surgical v. Hologic
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
To Sue or To Be Sued, That May Be the Question: Venue Consequences of Pre-Litigation Patent Communications
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Second Quarter 2021 Federal Circuit Law Update
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report
Intellectual Property Report
Client UpdatesIntellectual Property Report