Andrew Wilson

Special Counsel

Andrew Wilson Photo

Washington, D.C.

P: +1.202.639.1312
F: +1.202.508.9336
  • AG 18, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC., 2-21-cv-15737 (DNJ) (PTAB)
  • Certain Fitness Devices, Streaming Components Thereof, and Systems Containing Same; 337-TA-1265 (ITC)
  • Certain Video Security Equipment and Systems, Related Software, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; 337-TA-1281 (ITC)
  • DraftKings Inc., a Delaware corporation v. Interactive Games LLC, (PTAB) (Fed. Cir.)
  • Certain Toner Cartridges, Components Thereof, and Systems Containing Same; 337-TA-1174 (ITC)
  • ARRIS Solutions, Inc. et al v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC (PTAB) – representing Petitioner in IPR’s involving patents asserted in parallel District Court proceedings
  • Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. v. Cambium Networks, Inc. et al (E.D. Ill.) – representing Defendant against competitor on claims related to firmware for wireless access points
  • Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. ARRIS Solutions, Inc. (D. Colo. & PTAB) – representing Defendant against non-practicing entity on five patents directed to streaming technology
  • Data Scape Limited v. Teradata Operations, Inc. (C.D. Cal. & E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendant against non-practicing entity on five patents related to data storage management and distribution
  • Unified Patents Inc. v. GE Video Compression (PTAB) – represented Petitioner in IPR involving video compression technology
  • Certain Flash Memory Devices and Components Thereof (ITC) – represented Respondent in case involving flash memory technology
  • Teradata Operations, Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC (PTAB) – represented Petitioner in IPR’s involving patents asserted in parallel District Court proceedings related to compression technology
  • Realtime Data LLC v. Teradata Operations, Inc. (E.D. Tex., C.D. Cal., & PTAB) – represented Defendant against non-practicing entity on five patents directed to compression technology
  • Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. f'real Foods, LLC (PTAB) – represented Petitioner in IPR’s involving patents asserted in parallel District Court proceedings
  • BrightEdge Technologies, Inc. v. Searchmetrics, GmbH. et al (N.D. Cal.) represented BrightEdge in competitor patent infringement litigation involving SEO technology
  • Courtesy Products, LLC v. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (D. Del.) – represented Defendant against competitor patent infringement litigation involving milkshake machines