Wayne Stacy

Partner

Wayne Stacy Photo

San Francisco

P: +1.415.291.6206 F: +1.415.291.6306

Representative Cases - Defense:

  • Finisar v. Oplink Communications (Northern District of California) - counsel for Oplink Communications against a major competitor in a patent infringement suit concerning optical transceivers and microcontrollers
  • Mondis v. Chimei-Innolux et al. (Eastern District of Texas) - counsel for Chimei-Innolux in a patent infringement litigation relating to control of displays
  • Centrify v. Quest Software (Northern District of California) - counsel for Quest in a patent infringement litigation against a major competitor in the enterprise-level software security space
  • Finjan v. Webroot et al. (Delaware) - counsel for Webroot in a patent infringement suit related to software security
  • QinetiQ v. Oclaro (Northern District of California) - counsel for Oclaro in a patent infringement suit related to optical components
  • Klausner Technologies v. Qwest Telecommunications et al. (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Qwest in a patent infringement action involving telecommunications hardware and software
  • Web Telephony v. Qwest Telecommunications et al. (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Qwest in a patent infringement action involving telecommunications hardware and software
  • In the Matter of Certain Tunable Laser Chips (International Trade Commission) - litigation counsel for Bookham, the respondent, in a patent litigation involving tunable lasers
  • Widevine, Inc. v. Verimatrix (Western District of Washington) - counsel for Verimatrix against a major competitor in a patent litigation involving video delivery to mobile devices
  • Widevine, Inc. v. Verimatrix (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Verimatrix, the accused infringer, in a patent litigation involving video delivery security
  • Bookham, Inc. v. JDS Uniphase (Northern District of California) - litigation counsel for Bookham against a major competitor in a patent litigation involving tunable lasers
  • Stratos LightWave v. Picolight (Delaware District Court) - litigation counsel to Picolight in a patent-infringement litigation involving vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VSCELS)

Representative Cases - Plaintiff:

  • Oplink Communications v. Finisar (Eastern District of Texas) - counsel for Oplink Communications against a major competitor in a patent infringement suit involving semiconductor lasers (VCSELS)
  • Quest Software v. Centrify (District of Utah) - counsel for Quest in a patent infringement litigation against a major competitor in the enterprise-level software security space
  • HyperRoll, Inc. v. Hyperion Solutions (Northern District of California) - litigation counsel for HyperRoll in a competitor-on-competitor infringement suit involving database software
  • Qualcomm Incorporated v. Nokia Corporation (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Qualcomm in a patent infringement action involving cellular telephony systems and mobile TV applications
  • Quest Software v. Witness Systems (Northern District of California) - litigation counsel to Quest Software against a competitor in a software copyright infringement action involving database software
  • Positive Technologies v. Fujitsu America et al. (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel to Positive Technologies in a patent-infringement litigation against Fujitsu and others. The technology in this case involves LCD and plasma display technology
  • Bookham, Inc. v. Unaxis Balzers AG (Northern District of California) - litigation counsel to Bookham in a declaratory judgment action for non-infringement brought against Unaxis Balzers. The technology in this case involved color wheels used in light-projection engines
  • Analytical Spectral Devices v. CDEX (District of Colorado) - litigation counsel to Analytical Spectral Devices in a patent-infringement litigation involving hardware and software for validating the identity of pharmaceuticals
  • Applied Films GMBH v. Galileo Vacuum Systems (Northern District of Georgia) - litigation counsel to Applied Films in a patent-infringement litigation against Galileo Vacuum Systems and its U.S. subsidiary. The technology in this case involves web-coating systems
  • Quest Software v. Saint Technologies (Canadian Federal Court) - U.S. litigation counsel to Quest Software and consultant for Canadian litigation involving software copyright issues. The technology in this case involves database-management software
  • Outlast Technologies v. Frisby Technologies (Colorado District Court) (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals) - litigation counsel to Outlast Technologies in a patent-infringement case against Frisby involving phase change materials used to regulate body temperature
  • Picolight v. Honeywell (Delaware District Court) - litigation counsel to Picolight in a patent-infringement litigation involving vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VSCELS)