Tommy Martin

Partner

Tommy Martin

Washington, D.C.

P: +1.202.639.7752
F: +1.202.585.4093
  • Diogenes Limited & Colossus (IOM) Ltd. v. DraftKings Inc. (D. Del.) – Representing defendant in eight-patent infringement litigation involving features of online gaming
  • Certain Video Security Equipment and Systems, Related Software, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1281) – Representing complainant in multi-patent Section 337 investigation before the ITC concerning smart video analytics
  • E-Z Ink, Inc. et al v. Brother Industries, Ltd. (E.D. Va.) – Representing respondent in declaratory judgment litigation in the Eastern District of Virginia concerning toner cartridge technologies
  • Chu v. Universal Air Conditioner Inc. (E.D. Tex.) – Representing respondent in design patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas concerning automotive air compressors
  • Certain Fitness Devices, Streaming Components Thereof, and Systems Containing Same (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1265) – Representing complainant in multi-patent Section 337 investigation before the ITC concerning adaptive bitrate streaming technology
  • Certain Artificial Eyelash Extension Systems, Products, and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1226) – Representing defendant in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning false eyelash technologies
  • Certain Chemical Mechanical Planarization Slurries and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1204) – Representing complainant in 337 investigation before the ITC concerning semiconductor manufacturing technologies
  • Certain High-Density Fiber Optic Equipment and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1194) – Represented respondent in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning fiber optic technologies
  • Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1174) – Represented complainant in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning toner cartridge technologies
  • Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing Same (II) (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1076) – Represented complainant in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning magnetic tape data storage technologies
  • Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1058) – Represented respondent in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning magnetic tape data storage technologies
  • Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1036) – Represented respondent in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning magnetic tape data storage technologies
  • Certain Flash Memory Devices and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1034) – Represented respondent in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning power consumption and data addressing in flash memory devices
  • Single-Molecule Nucleic Acid Sequencing Systems and Reagents, Consumables, and Software for Use with Same (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1032) – Represented respondent in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning DNA sequencing technology
  • Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing Same (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1012) – Represented complainant in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning magnetic tape data storage technologies
  • Brother Industries, Ltd. et al v. Linkyo Corp. (C.D. Ca.) – Represented complainant in declaratory judgment litigation in the Central District of California concerning toner cartridge technologies
  • Milestone IP LLC v. Capital One, National Association (W.D. Tex.) – Represented defendant in patent infringement litigation in the Western District of Texas concerning electronic banking technology
  • Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (N.D. Ca.) – Represented defendant in patent infringement litigation in the Northern District of California concerning telecommunications technology
  • Zix Corporation v. Echoworx Corporation (E.D. Tex. / N.D. Tex.) – Represented plaintiff in patent infringement litigation in the Eastern and Northern Districts of Texas concerning data encryption technology
  • Ultratec, Inc. et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc. et al. (W.D. Wis.) – Represented defendants in multi-patent infringement litigation in the Western District of Wisconsin, and as a petitioner in inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial an Appeals Board, concerning captioned telephone technology
  • Certain Electronic Products, Including Products With Near Field Communication (“NFC”) System Level Functionality and/or Battery Power-Up Functionality, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1058) – Represented respondent in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning NFC technology and battery technology
  • Certain Crawler Cranes and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-887) – Represented complainant in multi-patent and trade secret 337 investigation before the ITC concerning variable position counterweight technology
  • Protegrity Corp. v. Safenet, Inc. (D. Conn.) – Represented defendant in patent infringement litigation in the District of Connecticut concerning data encryption technology
  • LG Electronics v. ASKO Appliances, Inc. et al. (D. Del.) – Represented defendants in multi-patent infringement litigation in the District of Delaware concerning washing machine direct-drive technology
  • Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices and Components Thereof (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-804) – Represented four of the named respondents in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning LED lighting technology
  • Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory and NAND Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-803) – Represented respondent in multi-patent 337 investigation before the ITC concerning DRAM memory technology
  • Greenkeepers of Delaware, LLC/Greenkeepers, Inc. v. Taylor Made Golf Co., Inc. et al. (E.D. Pa.) – Represented plaintiff in patent infringement litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania concerning outwardly angled golf cleats
  • Nexans Inc. v. General Cable Corp. (E.D. Pa.) – Represented defendant and counter claimant in patent infringement litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania concerning defendant's patents directed to paired electrical cables