Theodore W. Chandler

Partner

Ted Chandler

San Francisco

P: +1.415.291.6259
F: +1.415.291.6359
M: +1.213.202.5702
Select Options
  • MicroPairing Technologies LLC v. American Honda Motor Co., No. 2:21-cv-04034-JVS-KES (C.D. Cal. filed May 13, 2021) (Selna, J.). Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned multiprocessor systems. Stayed in 2022.
  • LG Electronics Inc. v. Hisense Elecs. Mfg. Co. of Am. Corp. et al., No. 2:19-cv-09474 (C.D. Cal. filed Nov. 4, 2019) (Kronstadt, J.). Represented the patent owner. Patents-in-suit concerned digital televisions. Settled in 2021.
  • Yardi Systems, Inc. v. Property Solutions International Inc., No. 2:13-cv-07764 (C.D. Cal. filed Oct. 21, 2013) (Olguin, J.). Represented the owner of copyrights and trade secrets concerning property management software. Settled in 2019.
  • LG Innotek Co. v. MelodySusie Brand Indus. Co., No. 2:18-cv-06404 (C.D. Cal. filed July 25, 2018) (Wu, J.). Represented the patent owner. Patents-in-suit concerned LEDs. Settled in 2018.
  • Netlist, Inc. v. SK hynix Inc. et al., No. 8:16-cv-01605 (C.D. Cal. filed Aug. 31, 2016) (Staton, J.). Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned memory modules. Stayed in 2017 in light of IPRs.
  • Dynamic Digital Depth PTY LTD v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., No. 2:15-cv-05578 (C.D. Cal. filed July 23, 2015) (Wu, J.): Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned 3D technology. Settled in 2017.
  • Signal IP, Inc. v. Toyota N. Am., Inc. et al., No. 2:15-cv-05162 (C.D. Cal. filed July 8, 2015) (Kronstadt, J.): Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned automotive technologies. Settled in 2017.
  • Panasonic Corp. et al. v. Encore Media Servs., Inc. et al., No. 2:15-cv-02050 (C.D. Cal. filed Mar. 19, 2015) (Kronstadt, J.): Represented the patent owners. Patents-in-suit concerned the DVD standard. Settled in 2016.
  • Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., No. 2:14-cv-00912 (E.D. Tex. filed Sept. 26, 2014) (Gilstrap, J.): Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned 2G and 3G standards for mobile phones. Jury trial in 2016.
  • Nexus Display Techs. LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., No. 2:14-cv-05694 (C.D. Cal. filed July 17, 2014) (Selna, J.): Represented one of the accused infringers. Patents-in-suit concerned video transmission. Settled in 2016.
  • ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. filed Dec. 18, 2013) (Gilstrap, J.): Represented one of the accused infringers. Patents-in-suit concerned digital rights management. Jury trial in 2015.
  • Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-00329 (C.D. Cal. filed Mar. 2, 2012) (Guilford, J.): Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned remote controls for televisions. Jury trial in 2014.
  • Medtronic MiniMed Inc. et al. v. Animas Corp., No. 2:12-cv-04471 (C.D. Cal. filed May 22, 2012) (Lew, J.): Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned insulin pumps. Settled in 2014.
  • Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2:11-cv-01408 (W.D. Wash. filed Aug. 25, 2011) (Robart, J.): Represented the accused infringer. Patents-in-suit concerned smartphones. Stayed in 2012.
  • eBay Inc. et al. v. Kelora Sys., LLC, No. 4:10 cv 04947 (N.D. Cal. filed Nov. 2, 2010) (Wilken, J.): Represented two of the accused infringers. Patent-in-suit concerned parametric searching. Summary judgment of invalidity granted in 2012.
  • Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson et al., No. 3:02-cv-00790 (N.D. Cal. filed Feb. 14, 2002) (Illston, J.): Represented the accused infringers and the counterclaim plaintiff. Patents-in-suit concerned balloon catheters. Jury trial in 2007.

Examples of investigations in the International Trade Commission (ITC):

  • In re Certain Artificial Eyelash Extension Systems, Products, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1226 (USITC filed Sept. 9, 2020) (Bullock, C.A.L.J.): Represented four of the respondents. Patents-in-suit concerned artificial eyelashes. Bench trial in 2021.
  • In re Certain Memory Modules and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1089 (USITC filed Oct. 31, 2017) (Bullock, C.A.L.J.): Represented the respondents. Patents-in-suit concerned memory modules. Bench trial in 2019.
  • In re Certain Memory Modules and Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1023 (USITC filed Sept. 1, 2016) (Essex, A.L.J.): Represented the respondents. Patents-in-suit concerned memory modules. Bench trial in 2017.
  • In re Certain Encapsulated Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-501 (USITC filed Nov. 17, 2003) (Bullock, A.L.J.): Represented the complainant. Patents-in-suit concerned packaging for semiconductors. Bench trials in 2004 and 2009.
  • In re Certain Flash Memory Controllers, Drives, Memory Cards, and Media Players and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-619 (USITC filed Oct. 24, 2007) (Bullock, A.L.J.): Represented one of the respondents. Patents-in-suit concerned flash memory. Bench trial in 2008.
  • In re Certain Digital Televisions and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-617 (USITC filed Oct. 15, 2007) (Charneski, A.L.J.): Represented three of the respondents. Patents-in-suit concerned digital televisions. Bench trial in 2008.

Examples of proceedings in the Patent Office:

  • IPR2020-01164, -01208, -01335, -01513: Represented the patent owner. Patents concerned digital televisions.
  • IPR2018-00362, -00363, -00364, -00365: Represented the petitioners. Patents concerned memory modules.
  • IPR2017-00549, -00577: Represented the petitioners. Patents concerned memory modules.
  • IPR2014-01082, -01084, -01102, -01103, -01104, -01106, -01109, -01111, -01112, -01146: Represented the petitioner. Patents concerned remote controls for televisions.