Nicolas Barzoukas’s practice is devoted to intellectual property litigation. He concentrates on patent litigation in the pharmaceutical field, but he has also litigated patents related to chemistry, electronics, biotechnology, medical devices, lasers and mechanical systems. In 2001, Texas Lawyer recognized him as one of 40 “Up-and-Comers” in Texas. Mr. Barzoukas has been recognized in Chambers USA, 2007-2015 in the field of Patent Litigation in Texas, which in 2011, resulted in his recognition as a top IP lawyer by the Houston Business Journal.
His representations in Hatch-Waxman Act patent infringement suits have resulted in the protection of the franchises for several blockbuster pharmaceutical products, such as Fosamax®, Fosamax® OW, Vasotec®, Pepcid®, Actonel®, Vioxx®, Temodar®, Singulair® and Nasonex®. Mr. Barzoukas has also asserted and defended parties in non-Hatch-Waxman patent cases in the pharmaceutical field involving products such as Loprox®, Vanos®, Ziana® and Vasotec®. In addition, Mr. Barzoukas challenged the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s rule denying the application of Hatch-Waxman Act patent term restoration to patents receiving a new, 20-year, patent term established by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.
Mr. Barzoukas participates in all aspects of litigation, from initial case development through trial and appellate representation. Specifically, he has been involved in all aspects of discovery, and has conducted Markman hearings, opening statements, witness presentation, closing arguments and appellate arguments before the Federal Circuit. Additionally, he has often coordinated the strategy and conduct of foreign corresponding trials related to cases co-pending in the United States.
Mr. Barzoukas also organized and taught the patent litigation course at The University of Texas School of Law from 2008 to 2011 as an adjunct faculty member.
In addition to litigation matters, Mr. Barzoukas also counsels clients on intellectual property enforcement matters, defensive and offensive litigation strategy, freedom to operate, settlement negotiations and licensing. He has also directed complex proceedings before the Patent Office involving challenges to asserted patents.