NEW YORK, March 27, 2015 -- In a recent article published by New York Law Journal, Intellectual Property partner, Rob Scheinfeld discusses the Federal Court’s insight on patent application drafting involving Garmin Products.
In the article, Scheinfeld states, "In Pacing, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Garmin’s accused products do not infringe the asserted claims of Pacing’s U.S. Patent No. 8,101,843."
Throughout the article, Scheinfeld discusses patent language and meaning of terms in detail. He concludes by stating, "In the end, a patent’s claims and a resulting infringement finding will need clear support from a patent’s specifications."
To read the complete New York Law Journal article, please click here.