|
For more information, please contact:
Sean Boland
Rufus Oliver
John Taladay
To learn more about our Antitrust and Competition Law Practice, please click here. |
ANTITRUST UPDATE - January 27, 2012
FTC Increases Thresholds for Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and Corporate Interlock Statute
On January 27, 2012, the FTC published in the Federal Register its annual adjustments of dollar jurisdictional threshold amounts in the Hart-Scott-Rodino (“HSR”) Act and Section 8 of the Clayton Act (“Corporate Interlock Statute”). These changes reflect last year’s percentage increase in the gross national product. The new HSR thresholds will become effective February 27, 2012.
REVISED HSR THRESHOLDS
Once again the thresholds have moved upward. Under the revised thresholds, transactions valued at more than $68.2 million will be subject to HSR report-and-wait-requirements (unless covered by an exemption). A complete list of the revised indexed thresholds is as follows:
The HSR filing fees have not changed but the transaction value ranges to which they apply have been adjusted:
CORPORATE INTERLOCK THRESHOLDS
Under the revised thresholds, one person may not serve simultaneously as an officer or director of competing corporations if each "interlocked" corporation has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $27,784,000 (originally, $10,000,000). The threshold amount applicable to the statutory “safe harbor” based on the dollar value of “competitive sales” has also been revised: a corporate interlock does not violate the statute if the “competitive sales” of either interlocked corporation are less than $2,778,400 (originally $1,000,000). The statutory safe harbors based on percentages of annual total sales remain unchanged.
The revised corporate interlock thresholds became effective immediately upon their publication in the Federal Register on January 27, 2012. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The materials in this document are made available by Baker Botts L.L.P. for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. The transmission and receipt of information contained in the document do not form or constitute an attorney-client relationship. If these materials are inconsistent with the rules governing attorney communications in a particular jurisdiction, and the materials result in a client contact in such jurisdiction, Baker Botts may be prohibited from assuming representation of the client contact.
Under the rules of certain jurisdictions, this communication may constitute ‘Attorney Advertising’. Unsubscribe:If you do not wish to be a member of this mailing list, please click here. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| © 2012 Baker Botts L.L.P. All Rights Reserved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||