June 30, 2010

Baker Botts Office

Alien Tort Statute Update

Supreme Court, SDNY Issue Alien Tort Statute Decisions With Important Implications For Multinational Corporations

Two recent decisions leave the door open for more Alien Tort Statute filings against multinational corporations and encourages companies to take a hard look at their overseas operations.

Southern District Dismisses Alien Tort Statute Case Against Shell’s Nigerian Subsidiary for Lack of Jurisdiction

The Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) permits an “alien” to bring suit in U.S. federal court for a violation of international law occurring anywhere in the world. In Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., Nigerian plaintiffs brought suit under the ATS against Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (“SPDC”), a Nigerian subsidiary of Royal Dutch/Shell, alleging that their protests of SPDC’s oil development and exploration activities in Nigeria were violently suppressed by the Nigerian government with SPDC’s cooperation and assistance. Last week, Judge Kimba Wood of the Southern District of New York dismissed the case against SPDC for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Kiobel decision makes clear the importance, in ATS litigation, of maintaining corporate formalities. Similarly-situated multinational corporations at risk of ATS litigation would be well-advised to review their organizational structure with this in mind.

To read this entire update, please click here.

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses To Decide Case Addressing Corporate Liability Under The Alien Tort Statute

On June 29, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to the applicability of the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) to corporations. The U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to provide any guidance as to what level of foreign state participation in overseas operations leaves corporations with substantial uncertainty as to how to avoid ATS liability, and encourages plaintiffs’ counsel—which include sophisticated public interest law firms and well-funded interest groups—to file still more ATS cases, making ever more inventive and tenuous allegations of cooperation between multinational corporations and foreign governments.

To read this entire update, please click here.

 

The materials in this document are made available by Baker Botts L.L.P. for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. The transmission and receipt of information contained in the document do not form or constitute an attorney-client relationship. If these materials are inconsistent with the rules governing attorney communications in a particular jurisdiction, and the materials result in a client contact in such jurisdiction, Baker Botts may be prohibited from assuming representation of the client contact.

UNSUBSCRIBE: If you would like to no longer be a member of this mailing list, please click here.

Under the rules of certain jurisdictions, this communication may constitute 'Attorney Advertising'.